Apple vs. Elon
The App Store Lesson Every AI Founder Needs to Learn
If you build on someone else’s platform, they decide whether your product gets the top shelf or the back corner.
Last week, Elon Musk accused Apple of stacking the App Store deck for his biggest AI rival — and it’s a playbook every founder should pay attention to.
Elon Musk says Apple is rigging the App Store to keep OpenAI’s ChatGPT at the top and his xAI Grok in the shadows.
Sam Altman, OpenAI’s CEO (and Musk’s former co-founder), says Musk is projecting — and manipulating his own platform — while the internet fact-checks them both in real time.
The players and the products:
Elon Musk’s xAI – Founded in 2023 to compete directly with OpenAI. Its chatbot, Grok, prides itself on “uncensored” answers and Musk-style humor. Integrated into X (formerly Twitter), Grok recently launched version 4, its fastest model yet.
Sam Altman’s OpenAI – Co-founded by Musk in 2015, now best known for ChatGPT. Unlike Grok, ChatGPT has multiple safety layers to avoid controversial or offensive answers. In 2024, OpenAI struck a deal with Apple to embed ChatGPT into Siri and system features in iOS 18.
When Musk claims Apple favors OpenAI, he’s not talking about a random competitor — he’s talking about a direct rival now built into every iPhone.
⸻
How It Unfolded
June 10, 2024 – Apple announces OpenAI partnership: ChatGPT will be accessible in Siri and baked into iOS. This sets the stage for favoritism claims.
January 2025 – DeepSeek, a Chinese AI chatbot, briefly reaches #1 overall on the App Store — showing non-OpenAI apps can top the charts.
July 18, 2025 – Perplexity AI hits #1 in India’s App Store.
August 11, 2025, 7:07 AM PT – Musk posts on X accusing Apple of “making it impossible” for any AI app but ChatGPT to reach #1. Calls it an “unequivocal antitrust violation” and promises “immediate legal action.” Notes Grok is #5 overall but missing from Apple’s “Must-Have Apps.”
August 11, later – Altman replies, calling Musk’s claim “remarkable” given allegations Musk manipulates X’s algorithm to help himself and hurt competitors. Musk fires back; Altman challenges him to sign an affidavit denying it.
August 11, evening – A Community Note appears on Musk’s post, citing DeepSeek (Jan) and Perplexity (July) as proof his “impossible” claim is wrong.
August 12, 2025 – Apple responds via Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman: the App Store is “fair and free of bias,” with rankings based on objective criteria and curated lists chosen for “safe discovery.” Many read “safe” as “we don’t feature apps with brand-safety problems” — like Grok’s recent controversies. In recent weeks, Grok was widely criticized for posting antisemitic comments, praising Hitler, and even calling itself “MechaHitler,” prompting a swift apology and system updates from xAI.
⸻
What’s Really at Stake
This isn’t about one leaderboard slot. It’s about platform gatekeeping: who controls discovery, who gets featured, and whether that control can quietly decide the winners in your market.
Rankings vs. Curation: Charts are algorithmic; curated lists are editorial. Editorial power is subjective and massively influential.
The Partner–Competitor Problem: Apple’s integration gives ChatGPT a baked-in distribution advantage no rival can match. Not illegal by itself, but the optics are clear.
The Content Filter – Apple avoids promoting apps that could cause PR or regulatory blowback. Grok’s unfiltered style — including recent headlines about Nazi references, antisemitic outputs, and even calling itself “MechaHitler” — gives Apple an easy out. That’s not just optics; it’s the kind of brand-safety call Apple’s lawyers can point to later as an alternative reason to keep it off the App Store’s front page.
⸻
Why Musk’s Case Is a Long Shot
To win, Musk would have to prove:
Apple has monopoly power in iOS app distribution (maybe true… still up for debate).
Apple engaged in exclusionary conduct favoring OpenAI (not proven).
This harmed competition and consumers (unclear).
The facts so far cut against him: DeepSeek and Perplexity have both reached #1 since Apple’s OpenAI deal, undermining the idea that topping the charts is “impossible.”
And even if Musk cleared those hurdles, Apple has an easy closing line: the Sherman Act — the core U.S. antitrust law — does not require Apple to platform or promote an app that’s been spouting Nazi propaganda.
That shifts the narrative from “Apple is protecting a competitor” to “Apple is protecting its brand,” and judges tend to side with the latter.
⸻
The Distribution Lesson Most Founders Miss
Curated placement is private real estate – Apple’s “front page” is controlled space, and access is not guaranteed.
Embedded integrations are contractual moats – Once a platform builds in your competitor, they don’t need to promote you.
Ranking algorithms are a black box – Without transparency, you can’t easily prove bias, even if you suspect it.
⸻
How to Avoid Being in Musk’s Position
Never rely on “being featured” as a growth plan – it’s a bonus, not a guarantee.
If you partner with a platform, negotiate placement – in writing, with specifics.
Plan for the day your platform becomes your competitor – because it will.
Diversify your acquisition channels – treat platform algorithms as an unstable dependency.
⸻
The Bottom Line
This isn’t just Apple vs. Musk. It’s a preview of the next platform war in AI — and the oldest rule in distribution: if you don’t own the shelf, you don’t own the customer.
And if you’re not the gatekeeper, your access can change overnight.
⸻
🤖 Subscribe to AnaGPT
Every week, I break down the latest legal in AI, tech, and law—minus the jargon. Whether you’re a founder, creator, or lawyer, this newsletter will help you stay two steps ahead of the lawsuits.
➡️ Forward this post to someone working on AI. They’ll thank you later.
➡️ Follow Ana on Instagram @anajuneja
➡️ Add Ana on LinkedIn @anajuneja