Deepfakes Without the Face
(Or: How to Copyright Your Soul Before Someone Else Sells It)
Let’s say someone builds a bot that sounds exactly like you.
Not your literal voice. Not your face. Just your rhythm, your tone, your "I’m about to drag a legal doctrine and cite footnotes while doing it" energy. It swears like you. It references the same obscure 2nd Circuit cases. It knows your timing. It ends jokes like you.
But legally? It’s not you.
No name, no face, no voice. Just your vibe—wrapped in enough plausible deniability to clear a compliance review and close a funding round.
And the worst part?
That’s not illegal.
Because under current U.S. law, you can’t own your vibe.
We’re Past Deepfakes. This Is Personality Piracy.
This isn’t a face swap. This isn’t the sound of your voice stitched onto someone else’s mouth.
This is the synthetic remastering of your identity into a “new” product that just happens to move, talk, and persuade like the original.
We’re calling it vibe theft—but let’s be honest: it’s identity laundering.
And it’s already happening:
Startups training models on influencer podcasts
AI avatars that “don’t represent anyone specific,” except everyone recognizes who it is
Legal and finance bots that drop your phrasing with zero attribution and 100% swagger
No face? No voice? No lawsuit.
That’s where we are.
The Law Still Thinks You're Just a Headshot and a Jingle
Most right of publicity laws protect:
Name
Image
Voice
Signature (don’t ask)
They do not protect:
Syntax
Emotional cadence
That thing you do when you land a joke, pause, and pivot into a citation bomb
Style
And without those protections? Anyone can train a bot on your persona, strip the branding, and hit “deploy.”
You Can’t Copyright a Person. But You Can Copyright a Character.
This is the part nobody’s talking about. The real play isn’t in NIL law. It’s in character copyright.
If your persona is consistent, expressive, and appears in fixed, creative works—there’s a real argument that it qualifies for protection.
Courts have already done this with:
Comic book heroes
TV characters
Animated mascots
Even recurring fictional versions of real people
Why not you?
If you’ve built a body of work—a podcast, a newsletter, a video series—featuring a stylized version of yourself, then you may have created something protectable.
Not you the person.
You the character.
That’s the hack.
Copyrighting Your Vibe (Isn’t a Joke Anymore)
Let’s be clear: this isn’t some weird performative legal flex. This is a strategic shield for the kind of people AI is already copying.
If you want to be able to stop someone from building a synthetic version of your personality without your consent, copyright might be your best move.
You’d need:
A consistent public-facing persona
Recurring expressive traits (style, tone, structure)
Fixed works (scripts, blogs, videos, etc.)
Enough distance between you and the performance of you to make it a creative expression
It won’t be easy. Courts aren’t handing these out like parking passes.
But if you’ve built a recognizable voice and monetized it?
It might be the most valuable copyright you ever file.
Developers Aren’t Avoiding You—They’re Skimming You
AI models don’t need to copy your face. They just need your content.
And let’s be honest: you gave them plenty.
You thought you were building a brand. Turns out, you were creating a training set.
They fine-tune on your style. Strip the name. Launch a bot.
It’s “not you”—but everyone who hears it knows exactly where it came from.
It’s not parody. It’s not tribute. It’s a copy without attribution and a revenue stream without a contract.
And unless your personality is registered as a character?
There’s not much you can do about it.
This Is Already a Business Model
Let’s call it what it is: synthetic personality as a service.
VCs are funding it. Tech bros are building it. Brands are licensing it.
And creators, founders, and experts are getting cloned without pay, control, or recourse.
You don’t need to be Beyoncé for this to matter.
You just need to be recognizable.
And consistent.
And profitable.
If you’ve built a public persona that speaks with authority—guess what? That’s what they want to train on.
Final Thought
You can’t copyright your face. You can’t trademark your tone.
But you can—maybe—copyright the stylized version of yourself you’ve spent the last five years performing online.
It’s hard. It’s unusual. But in a legal system that hasn’t caught up to synthetic identity theft, it’s one of the only tools that might work.
So no—you don’t own your vibe.
But you might be able to copyright your character.
And in 2025, that’s the most valuable IP asset you’ve got.
⸻
🤖 Subscribe to AnaGPT
3x a week [MWF], I break down the latest legal in AI, tech, and law—minus the jargon. Whether you’re a founder, creator, or lawyer, my newsletter will help you stay two steps ahead of the competition.
➡️ Forward this post to someone working in/on AI. They’ll thank you later.
➡️ Follow Ana on Instagram @anajuneja
➡️ Add Ana on LinkedIn @anajuneja