Google Just (Legally) Killed SEO
The Rolling Stone v. Google case might make your website irrelevant
Someone Googles “best wireless earbuds” or “how do I file quarterly taxes.”
Instead of clicking links — maybe yours — they get a tidy AI answer at the top of the page. They read it, move on, and you never see them.
Your Customers Might Never Reach Your Site Again
That’s happening now.
And Rolling Stone is suing Google over it.
(Yes, yet another media company suing yet another Big Tech AI company.)
Rolling Stone Took Google to Court — But It’s Really About You
In September 2025, Rolling Stone’s parent company sued Google.
Their accusation: Google turned from a search engine into an answer machine that steals the clicks businesses rely on.
They point to three things:
1️⃣ Traffic collapse. 20–34% fewer clicks when AI summaries appear. Affiliate revenue already down by a third.
2️⃣ Training without consent. Millions of Rolling Stone articles allegedly fed into Google’s Gemini AI for free.
3️⃣ Abuse of monopoly power. Publishers can’t say “no” without disappearing from search entirely.
The case headlines with Rolling Stone, but the subtext is clear: any business that counts on Google traffic to its site is at risk.
And meanwhile, Google isn’t just building features — it’s winning eyeballs.
Gemini just hit #1 in the U.S. App Store for the first time.
That means more users installing the app, generating outputs, and consuming information inside Google’s ecosystem rather than clicking out to the open web.
How This Ends: Google Wins (Almost) Everything
Here’s my contrarian prediction… Rolling Stone’s lawsuit makes headlines, but in court Google will walk away with almost everything intact.
Training is fair use. Judges have already said using lawfully obtained text to train AI is “highly transformative.” Rolling Stone’s “you trained on us” argument is weak (and Rolling Stone makes no claim that Google’s acquisition of articles was unlawful).
Outputs aren’t copy-paste. Google’s AI summarizes, it doesn’t regurgitate. That’s annoying for publishers but legally safer.
Antitrust courts don’t redesign products. Expect token remedies: attribution tweaks, maybe opt-out knobs, some licensing for optics. Not a dismantling of AI Overviews.
Opt-out exists, even if painful. Google can point to robots.txt and nosnippet. Courts see trade-offs as business choices, not coercion.
Traffic was never yours. Free clicks from Google were rented, not owned. The landlord just raised the rent.
The likeliest outcome? Google keeps the AI Overviews. Rolling Stone gets little more than PR mileage from the suit. And the rest of us are left to adapt to an answer-first internet whether we like it or not.
The “Regurgitation” Accusation — Explained Like a Human
Publishers say Google’s AI “regurgitates” (“spits out an exact copy of”) their work. That sounds like Google is copy-pasting whole articles.
That’s not what’s happening.
AI models don’t regurgitate, they generate. They learn patterns and then predict the next word — like autocomplete on steroids.
So what shows up in AI Overviews is usually a summary or paraphrase, not a literal copy.
But here’s the sting: for the user, it doesn’t matter. A two-sentence summary still replaces the click. If Google tells them “the top three wireless earbuds are X, Y, Z,” your detailed review is irrelevant — even if it wasn’t copied word-for-word.
Why This Fight Should Terrify Every Business With a Website
Rolling Stone’s complaint could have been written by any company that depends on traffic from searches:
The old deal: You write content, Google scans it, users click through to you.
The new deal: You write content, Google scans it, Google answers directly, you never see the user.
If the court forces Google to pay or limit this, companies get breathing room.
If not? Google keeps the eyeballs, and your website becomes optional.
Winners, Losers, and the Ones Who Don’t Know They’re Losing Yet
Winners: Google (ads), users (faster answers), advertisers (more inventory).
Losers: Rolling Stone today. Your company tomorrow.
Because this isn’t about journalism. It’s about whether your landing pages, blogs, or product guides ever get seen again.
How to Make Sure Your Website Still Matters
Become the Source AI Quotes: Publish data, frameworks, and takeaways that AI will lift and cite.
Put Value Beyond the Summary: Offer what a one-paragraph Google answer can’t: tools, calculators, proprietary insights.
Build Channels Google Can’t Steal: Email lists, podcasts, social media followings, communities. Direct distribution is your insurance policy.
Stop Treating SEO as a Free Lunch: Search clicks were always rented, never owned. Treat them as one channel, not your foundation.
The Harsh Truth You Can’t Ignore
Rolling Stone’s lawsuit may drag on for years. But the economics already shifted.
If your growth depends on free traffic from Google, you’re living on borrowed time.
Because Google didn’t just kill SEO for publishers. It killed SEO for everyone. And unless you change course, it might make your website (and your business) irrelevant too.
⸻
🤖 Subscribe to AnaGPT
Every week, I break down the latest legal in AI, tech, and law—minus the jargon. Whether you’re a founder, creator, or lawyer, this newsletter will help you stay two steps ahead of the lawsuits.
➡️ Forward this post to someone working on AI. They’ll thank you later.
➡️ Follow Ana on Instagram @anajuneja
➡️ Add Ana on LinkedIn @anajuneja